|Jefferson Banner - Opinion
Wal-Mart in Jefferson
This statement was sent by Brent Denzin, a Madison attorney, regarding the December 2005 lawsuit against the City of Jefferson.
- John Foust, goJefferson.com Webmaster
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 21, 2005
Residents and Small Business Owners File Suit to Preserve Right to Direct Legislation
Jefferson, WI – On Monday, Coalition for a Better Jefferson formally requested that the Jefferson County Circuit Court order the City of Jefferson to abide by the law and allow residents to vote on proposed direct legislation. With the action, the Coalition has filed for an injunction to stop the Council’s accelerated efforts to vote on a proposed 22-acre annexation for a Wal-Mart Supercenter before voters would have a chance to consider the proposed legislation.
The proposed legislation would require that the Council review traffic, infrastructure, community and environmental impact studies of the proposed land use before annexing more than 15 acres of land for development. Given that the costs are often tied to the size and potential impact of the proposed development, the Council would have the authority to require that the developers finance these studies as part of their proposed development.
The Coalition for a Better Jefferson is being represented by Midwest Environmental Advocates, Inc., a nonprofit environmental law center, and David Halbrooks, a Milwaukee attorney.
“The idea behind the ordinance is to consider an annexation’s effect, good or bad, on the City’s tax revenue, jobs, traffic and environment. After looking at these impacts, the Council is free to vote either way,” said John Rhiel, the Coalition for a Better Jefferson spokesman. “In denying the residents their right to vote, the Council has refused to consider infrastructure costs, economic effects, traffic and environmental impacts of creating instant commercial centers on the edge of the City.”
“The bottom line is the 456 residents who signed the petition have a right to see the ordinance on the ballot.” said Brent Denzin, attorney with Midwest Environmental Advocates. “The Council cannot simply ignore this right.”
In late October, the Jefferson Common Council was given the certified direct legislation petition. The legislation does not require the City to pay for the studies nor does it alter the Council’s ability to approve or reject proposals. The legislation would require the Council to receive more information before making a final vote.
On November, 15 th, the Jefferson Common Council refused to send the ordinance to the voters, despite the petitioners’ clear legal right. On the same day, the Council recognized a renewed proposal to annex 22 acres for a Wal-Mart Supercenter.
“These impact studies are used to promote educated decisions.” Rhiel says. “We would hope the Council would look at these impacts without the requirement, but their response seems to suggest otherwise.”
The Coalition hopes to set aside the rapid annexation hearings until the residents are allowed to vote on the proposal.