| Jefferson City Council - Minutes - 1999 |
This goJefferson.com Web presentation of these public documents is Copyright 1999 Syndesis Corporation.
MINUTES
city of jefferson common council
OCTOBER 19, 1999
The Tuesday, October 19, 1999, meeting of the City of Jefferson Common Council was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor Brawders. Members present: Ald. Wagner, Ald. Coffman, Ald. Oppermann, Ald. Wenzel, Ald. Johann, Ald. Tennyson, Ald. Stevens and Ald. Beyer. Also present were City Administrator Schornack, City Attorney Scheibel, Police Chief Besel, City Engineer Ludwig and Clerk/Treasurer Parlow.
COMMUNICATIONS
John Wagner extended sympathy to the family of Mona Olsen. He noted that she was a great lady and an incredible asset to our community and that we have all sustained a great loss.
Mayor Brawders read a letter from Jim Schroeder stating that he would no longer be working for WFAW. He thanked the City for their cooperation during his employment with the station.
Mayor Brawders then drew attention to a letter from Hilde Will supporting the Jefferson Area Senior Center.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Nancy Haberman, 536 East North Street, addressed the Council regarding the proposed Senior Center Facility. Haberman then read the Senior Committee's goals and missions. She stated that the members of the Committee had explored all the options in the last year and a half and that no existing building met their goals or expectations. She stated that the Senior's quest for a CDBG was denied primarily because of the City's good financial status. She further stated that a yes vote from the council means that you support a long overdue project and that a no vote means that once again you dusted off the seniors and put them back on the shelf.
Maryann Gleisner, 211 North Midway Avenue, addressed the Council regarding the proposed Senior Center Facility. She also stated that the Senior Committee had spent many, many hours on the project and that the Committee should be commended for their time and effort. Ms. Gleisner cited the May 12, 1998 meeting of the Senior Committee stating that the new facility should be located near other amenities, grocery stores, drug stores, restaurants—to maximize your taxi ride dollars. She further stated that she had resigned from the committee because she believed the facility was not being located in the right place. Gleisner stated that we need things like a Police Department and Water & Electric Department and our monies must go here. Gleisner stated that we need to maximize dollars and if the center was to move out of the City Hall location the whole lower level of the building would be vacant. Maximizing dollars is what we should be concerned with, she feels that since all citizens will be paying for a new facility all citizens should have a say in the decision and called for the City to take the decision to a city-wide vote.
Dev Trevor, General Manager Doskocil Foods, spoke to the Council regarding WWTP issues which have plagued the company. Mr. Trevor stated that in July the facility had 54 exceedences, in August 45 and in September 28. He stated that they are working hard to reduce the facility's exceedences. Grease traps will be installed later in November, hopefully to be completed by November 30th. Mr. Trevor indicated that at this time the company is unsure what effect this will have on the company's discharge of solids and BODs, but it is certainly a step in the right direction. Mr. Trevor further stated that the Doskocil Foods is intent upon going through and making good on the commitment they have made with the City.
Ray Seeber Jr., 973 North Dewey Avenue, addressed the Council regarding several issues. Mr. Seeber felt that the Police Department needs to step up its enforcement of the two hour parking in the downtown area. Mr. Seeber also questioned the placement of Locust trees in the downtown treescape. Mr. Seeber felt that these trees are a poor choice for the downtown, he also stated that he would like to see these trees replaced with columnar Maples and the Forestry budget increased. He also stated that he feels the City should take action against downtown building owners for what he sees as "eyesores". He felt that several buildings downtown need to be painted and have windows replaced.
Discussion-middle school development agreement
The Mayor stated that this item was placed on the agenda at the request of several alderpeople. Mayor Brawders gave a brief history of the City's developer agreement with the School District. Brawders stated that the water, sewer, and sidewalk on both sides of the street were items that the School felt uncomfortable with and further discussion may be needed. The Mayor then opened the floor up to anyone wishing to speak on the topic.
Ald. Coffman stated that at Streets Committee they had discussed a possible alternative to the lift station by the new middle school. He stated that the plan was preliminary and was probably best explained by the City Engineer.
City Engineer Ludwig stated that the City is just as nervous about the sanitary sewer situation as the School District is. The City has concerns about adding another lift station, which tend to be labor and equipment intensive. Ludwig stated that the City could potentially piggyback with the sewer project planned for the Wisconsin/Riverview Drive area in 2000. Ludwig noted that the project cost would more than double if the City chose to lower the sanitary sewer four feet and place a siphon under the Crawfish River. This is what the City believes would need to take place for the Middle School sanitary system to be gravity fed. This siphon would also serve future development needs in the Northwest quadrant of the City. Ludwig cautioned that this a preliminary plan and is now in the hands of the consultants, reports will be forthcoming to the Council.
City Administrator Schornack noted that this project would probably run in the neighborhood of $800,000. The City would be looking to the School District for a contribution to this project, it would be the City's intention not to bore the entire cost of the project.
Ald. Wagner indicated that the School District was still concerned with the sidewalk situation.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE RELATED TO UPDATES OF BUILDING CODE
Ald. Oppermann introduced Proposed Ordinance #11-99 for its second reading.
CITY OF JEFFERSON
PROPOSED ORDINANCE #11-99
An Ordinance to Repeal & Recreate Section 14.01(7) of the Municipal Code Related to Building Permit Fees.
The Common Council of the City of Jefferson, Wisconsin, does ordain as follows:
- Minimum Permit Fee for All Permits $ 25.00
- Residence: New One Family $375.00
New Two Family $475.00
- Buildings: Apartments, Three Family & $ .12/sq ft or
Over, Accessory, Local Business, fraction
Office Buildings, Institutional, thereof for all
Additions, Or Alterations Thereto floor areas
Permit to Start Construction of Footings and4. Manufacturing or Industrial (Office areas $ .08/sq ft or
to be included under No. 3) fraction thereof
Foundations:
a. One and Two Family $50.00
b. Multi-Family and Industrial/Commercial $75.00
6. All other Buildings, Structures, Alterations, $25 minimum
Repairs where square foot contents or $5/$1,000
can't be calculated of value
7. Wrecking or Razing $25 minimum+
(Building Inspector may waive fee, if $1/100 sq ft
structure is condemned)
8. Moving Buildings Over Public Ways $50 +
$2/100 sq ft principal buildings
$30 + $2/100 sq ft accessory buildings
Special Inspections – inspection necessary to $75.00confirm continued failure to correct
municipal code violation, or other
special inspection
Re-inspection-additional inspection $30.00
necessary to verify correction of
code violation
10. Wisconsin Uniform building Permit Seal $25.00
a. Residential – only Multi-family $25.00/unit
b. Commercial and Industrial $50.00
12. Zoning permits', pools, fences, signs and $25 minimum or
other required zoning permits $5/$1,000 value
- MECHANICAL AND MISCELLANEOUS
a. Automatic washer $ 5.00
b. Sink, dishwasher, garbage disposal $ 5.00
c. Water closet, lavatory, urinal $ 5.00
d. Laundry tray $ 5.00
e. Bath tub/shower $ 5.00
f. Hot tub, spa, whirpool, wash fountain $ 5.00
g. High pressure boiler $25.00
h. Drinking fountain sillcock $ 5.00
i. Floor drain, sight drain $ 5.00
j. Water heater, water softener $ 5.00
k. Sump pump, ejectors or pump $ 5.00
l. Manhole $10.00
m.Catch basin $ 5.00
n. Sprinkler heads $ .25
o. Sanitary building drain $10.00
Over 75ft. (add'l per ft.) $ .35
p. Storm building drain $10.00
Over 75ft. (add'l per ft.) $ .35
q. Sanitary sewer lateral $25.00
Over 100ft. (add'l per ft.) $ .35
r. Storm sewer lateral $25.00
Over 100ft. (add'l per ft.) $ .35
s. Water lateral $25.00
Over 75ft. (add'l per ft.) $ .35
t. Other permits $25.00
NEW BUILDING
a. Commercial Heating, Ventilating & Air $.02/sq ft
Conditioning for all areas
EXCEPT
unheated garages
b. One and Two Family Heating, Ventilating $.02/sq ft
& Air Conditioning for all areas
EXCEPT
unheated garages
REPLACEMENT & MODIFICATION OF HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT, MISC.
Gas, Oil, Electric & Coal Furnace and BoilerOne & Two Family-First 150,000 BTU $15.00
Commercial-First 150,000 BTU $25.00
All Over 150,000 BTU $3.00/50,000 BTU
Air ConditioningOne and Two Family $15.00
Commercial $25.00
All Over 36,000 BTU $2.00/12,000 BTU
e. Fireplace and Wood Burning Stove $15.00
f. Electric Baseboard, Wall Unit and $1.25/KW
Cabinet Unit
g. Duct Work Alteration $20.00
h. Other permits $25.00
- ELECTRICAL
a. Light switch and convenience outlet or $ .35
communication device
b. Power receptacle over 150 volts $ 5.00
over 30 amps $ 6.00
c. Lighting fixture $ .50
d. Temporary or permanent service, switch $25.00
alteration Over 200 amps-additional per 100 amps $ 5.00e. Refrigerating unit-per hp (4.00 minimum) $ .25
f. Heating furnace $ 5.00
g. Electric unit heating device (including $ 2.00
remote thermostat)
h. Air conditioning-per hp (5.00 minimum) $ .25
i. Combination heating and air condition- $10.00
ing unit
j. Feeder and sub-feeder-per 100 amp $ 5.00
capacity
k. Each motor, per hp $ 1.00
over 100 hp $ 2.50
l. Dispenser-gas, fuel oil, permanent $ 6.00
vending machine & well pump
m. Each generator and similar device $ 1.00
over 500 kw $ 2.50
n. Swimming pool (electrical wiring and $25.00
grounding)
o. Neon sign-per transformer (4.00 mini- $ .50
mum)
p. Florescent tube sign – (4.00 minimum) $ .15
q. Plug-in strip, trolley duct, trolley wire, $ .50
ect.
r. Wireway, busway, underfloor raceway $ .50
or auxiliary gutter
s. Visual electric signal or communication $ .50
device
t. Other permits $25.00
Fees will double if work is started before permit is issued.Minimum fee $25.00
Reinspection fee $25.00
Failure to call for inspection fee $25.00
Ald. Johann asked what the impact of these changes would mean.
Ald. Wenzel stated that he had figured that on an 1,800 sq. ft. home the increase would be approximately $50, in his estimations a larger home would be less expensive. He felt that the changes were not a big deal.
Ald. Johann asked what the impact would be for industry. City Administrator Schornack stated that he was unsure and that Guy Burlingame could come to the next meeting to explain the changes if the Council wished.
Ald. Tennyson, seconded by Ald. Wagner moved to table Proposed Ordinance #11-99. On call of the roll, motion carried on a vote of 5 to 2, with one abstention. Ald. Beyer and Ald. Coffman cast the dissenting votes and Ald. Wenzel abstained from the vote.
consent agenda
Ald. Wagner introduced Resolution No. 92.
CITY OF JEFFERSON
RESOLUTION nO. 92
BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Jefferson that the consent agenda for October 19, 1999 is hereby adopted.
The consent agenda for tonight includes:
Ald. Johann indicated that a completion date is to be specified on the Alpha Terra Contract—60 days from October 20.
Ald. Wagner, seconded by Ald. Tennyson moved to recommend Resolution No. 92. On call of the roll, motion carried unanimously.
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $1,600,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
Ald. Stevens introduced Resolution No. 93.
CITY OF JEFFERSON
RESOLUTION NO. 93
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF $1,600,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION POLICE FACILITY BONDS
WHEREAS the City of Jefferson, Jefferson County, Wisconsin (the "City") has duly received bids for its proposed issue of $1,600,000 General Obligation Police Facility Bonds (the "Bonds"); and
(Due to its length, In lieu of printing the complete text of this ordinance a complete copy is on file at the office of the City Clerk and is available for public inspection.)
Dave Anderson of Ehlers and Associates stated that the City had received eight bids, five more than the issuance of debt earlier this year. He stated that the low bid belonged to Banker's Bank out of Madison, WI , the true interest of the debt was calculated out of 5.1499%.
Ald. Stevens, seconded by Ald. Tennyson moved to recommend Resolution No. 93. On call of the roll, motion carried unanimously.
REQUEST TO INCLUDE DEBT PAYMENT FOR $1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR A NEW SENIOR CENTER INTO THE 2000 PROPOSED BUDGET
Ald. Johann introduced Resolution No. 94.
CITY OF JEFFERSON
RESOLUTION NO. 94
WHEREAS Council President Sue Johann, on behalf of the Senior Facility Committee, is requesting that the Common Council consider whether or not a debt payment of approximately $100,000 for a $1,200,000 General Obligation Bond issue be included in the 2000 Proposed Budget,
BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Jefferson, Wisconsin that a debt payment of approximately $100,000 for a $1,200,000 General Obligation Bond issue be included in the 2000 Proposed Budget.
Ald. Beyer indicated that an operating budget for the stand-alone facility had not been calculated, therefore the true costs of operating the center had not been discussed. She also stated that a lot of work had been done by the Committee's to get to this point, but there is still more work to be done. She felt that this should be referred back to the Park and Recreation Commission since this is the budget that would be effected by this addition.
Ald. Coffman stated that he had measured the lower level of the City Hall building. He stated that approximately 7,020 sq. ft. is available on the ground level, approximately the space of the "Old Red Owl" building which the Seniors originally wanted for a new center. He also added that the carport area of the, soon to be former Police Department site, would add an additional 2,300 sq. ft. of space. Coffman further stated that this is a favorable site because of the proximity to downtown businesses and Rotary Park.
Ald. Johann went through the chronology of events leading up to this point. She pinpointed events from Common Council, Park and Recreation Commission, Plan Commission and Senior Meetings. Johann then stated that the City could not put a price tag on the quality of life.
Ald. Oppermann stated that the Park & Recreation Commission was in support of the seniors goals and that they had approved the senior feasibility study.
Ald. Wagner stated that the bottom line is tax dollars, with that in mind he offered the following amendment.
Ald. Wagner proposed that the total amount of the note not exceed the $1,000,000 mark. He proposed that the resolution be revised to read an $80,000 payment and $998,250 in a General Obligation Bond issue. Motion died for a lack of a second.
Ald. Oppermann asked if operational costs for the new facility had been considered. Park & Recreation Director Keller stated that nothing was included in the 2000 Proposed Budget. Oppermann asked Keller for an estimated operations cost. Keller stated, that based upon a similar sized facility in Watertown, she would estimate approximately $70,000 in addition to the already budgeted amount of $39,000.
Ald. Johann indicated that in their feasibility study they had estimated costs, less wages, for operations. She referred this question to Nancy Haberman.
Nancy Haberman stated that $1,400 maintenance costs and $10,000 in operational costs would be sufficient to run the stand alone facility according to the feasibility study.
It was then explained that $80,000-100,000 would need to be included in the 2000 budget to accommodate the 2000 debt payment.
After questioning, Ald. Johann indicated that operational costs would not need to be included in the 2000 budget, because they would not have occupancy until late fall.
Ald. Wenzel asked if Furnishings and Equipment had been accounted for in the debt issuance.
Nancy Haberman noted that $20,000 had been placed into the bond for furnishings and $20,000 for equipment, and $10,000 for a phone system. Haberman noted that things like computers, printers and a copy machine had not been included in the bond. It is her feeling that these items could be donated or fundraisers could take place to purchase them.
Ald. Wenzel asked if a special HVAC system was going to be installed in light of the woodworking shop that will be in the facility. Haberman stated that this had been accounted for.
Ald. Wenzel stated that a very informal poll was taken at the current senior center about relocating. Wenzel stated that out of six responses, five were in favor of staying at the current site.
Ald. Wagner, seconded by Ald. Johann made an amendment to change of the name of the facility to the Jefferson Area Senior/Community Center. Ald. Wagner felt it was important to allow all ages to use the facility. On call of the roll, motion carried unanimously.
Ald. Oppermann stated that a lot of individuals from outside of the City use the facility and that the idea of Township subsidization of the facility was discussed. Ald. Oppermann felt that it was necessary to secure a commitment from the townships before the Council made a decision to fund the project.
Ald. Johann stated that there is not time to enter into discussions with the townships at this time. It is the committee's hope to let bids by January of 2000 to take advantage of favorable interest rates.
Ald. Beyer reminded the Council that we had just issued a $1.6M bond and that we shouldn't hit the taxpayers with another debt issuance right away. Beyer stated that her concern rested largely with the elderly and those on fixed incomes who struggle to pay their taxes.
Beyer felt that spreading the debt out over a couple of years would help eliminate any large variations in the levy. In addition, if the City waited a year, we could include the debt issuance for a new bathhouse. Ald. Beyer once again recognized the Committee's hard work, however, she felt staff's input was also very important and was not included in the Committee's presentation.
Clerk/Treasurer Parlow, at Ald. Beyer's request, outlined what the proposed increase could mean for owner of a $100,000 home. She noted that in 1998 approximately $634 in city taxes would have been paid on this home. In 1999 (using ESTIMATED figures) and the 2000 Proposed Budget, without Finance Committee changes, the same owner could expect to pay $690. Parlow then noted that adding a $90,000 debt service payment to the budget would increase the tax amount to $724 or approximately $90 over the 1998 city tax.
Ald. Johann stated that financial input, to arrive at the bond amount, had been received from the City Administrator.
Ald. Oppermann asked how this issuance would effect the City's debt capacity. City Administrator Schornack stated that the City would still be well under our cap.
Ald. Oppermann noted that the Proposed 2000 budget already included a 7 to 8% increase and that this issuance will add 5 to 6% for a total increase of approximately 14%. Oppermann stated that he certainly supports the efforts for a center, but he was also very concerned about cost—which had almost doubled since the grant was denied.
Ald. Coffman pointed out that the aquatic center bathhouse and numerous street projects had been removed, by staff, from the 2000 budget to reduce the mill rate increase to 7-8%.
Ald. Johann stated that she felt that many cuts could still be made to the budget and was confident that they could come up with $100,000 in further cuts.
Ald. Oppermann once again acknowledged the hard work of the Senior Committee, however, he felt that the project cost doubling for the City within a couple of weeks (due to the loss of the grant) was too much to adjust too. It was his suggestion to table the resolution and let the Park and Recreation Department review the actual operational costs.
Ald. Oppermann, seconded by Ald. Beyer moved to table Resolution No. 94. On call of the roll the vote was 4 to 4. Ald. Johann, Ald. Stevens, Ald. Tennyson and Ald. Wagner cast the dissenting votes. The Mayor chose not to vote, therefore denying the request to table.
Nancy Haberman stated that she was hopeful that they could get started next year with a new center. She stated that the chance to rewrite the grant was not good due the City's financial status. Haberman stated that she expects donations to start rolling in once the facility is made a reality. She further stated that the Friends of the Senior Center will continue to offer ongoing support to the facility. The group will continue to park cars, Haberman estimated that the Committee would be able to raise $5,000 for each car show during the year. She also stated that donations will cover any additional programming that the center would take on, therefore the City would not need to budget additional funds. Haberman noted that she does not see a need for the director to be made full-time, at this time, nor does she see the need for any additional personnel. The extra hours, such as a secretarial position and maintenance, will be made up by Green Thumb Workers. Haberman concluded by noting that the Friends of the Senior Center would continue to offer financial support to the City for the operation of the Center.
Ald. Johann, seconded by Ald. Tennyson moved to recommend Resolution No. 94. On call of the roll the motion tied at a 4 to 4 vote. Ald. Coffman, Ald. Oppermann, Ald. Wenzel and Ald. Beyer cast the dissenting votes. The Mayor then voted in favor of the motion. Mayor Brawders then stated that anyone opposed to the debt issuance should garner the needed signatures to bring to a referendum vote.
fischer field agreement with school district of Jefferson
Ald. Coffman introduced Resolution No. 95.
CITY OF JEFFERSON
RESOLUTION NO. 95
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Jefferson, Wisconsin that the City Administrator is authorized to execute the agreement between the City of Jefferson and the School District of Jefferson for the lease of the property known as "Fischer Field" and guaranteeing that said property will be available for use by the City for a five year period.
Ald. Wagner stated that he appreciated the cooperation with the School Board.
Ald. Oppermann spoke on behalf of the Park and Recreation Commission and expressed his gratitude for the positive working relationship between the school and the city.
Ald. Beyer asked if the agreement was endorsed by Director Keller. Keller responded affirmatively.
Ald. Coffman, seconded by Ald. Tennyson moved to recommend Resolution No. 95. Motion carried on a voice vote.
ENDORSEMENT OF WAUSAU-DULUTH TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
Ald. Tennyson introduced Resolution No. 96.
CITY OF JEFFERSON
RESOLUTION NO. 96
WHEREAS, the King-Eau Claire 345-kilovolt transmission line is the only major high voltage line connecting Wisconsin to the west; and
WHEREAS, the King-Eau Claire line routinely becomes overloaded resulting in line loading relief (certain contracts for movement of electricity over the line are denied) or loss of the entire line such as occurred on June 25, 1998; and
WHEREAS, residential, business and industrial customers across Wisconsin have risked blackouts during three of the past four summers because there was insufficient transmission access to other states and insufficient generation in the state to meet demand; and
WHEREAS, Governor Tommy Thompson, the State Legislature, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, business groups, and consumer groups all support increasing electric reliability in the State by adding needed infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, improved reliability of Wisconsin's transmission system is a necessary prerequisite to any movement toward greater retail competition in the electric utility industry; and
WHEREAS, improved reliability of Wisconsin's transmission system is necessary to allow Wisconsin's economy to continue to grow and prosper at record levels; and
WHEREAS, Wisconsin Public Service (WPS) Corp. and Minnesota Power Co. have proposed building a 250-mile 345-kilovolt transmission line from a WPS substation located at the Weston power plant south of Wausau to Minnesota Power's Arrowhead substation near Duluth, using existing rights of way where possible, with a completion target date of 2002 and an estimated cost of $125-$175 million; and
WHEREAS, the Wausau-Duluth line would be the first major, long-distance transmission line built in Wisconsin in over 30 years; and
WHEREAS, the Wausau-Duluth line is required to strengthen the regional power grid and to help reduce the electric system's vulnerability to disturbances; and
WHEREAS, the Wausau-Duluth line would complement the proposed Chicago-Apple River transmission line which is intended to primarily serve local needs in east central Minnesota and northwestern Wisconsin; and
WHEREAS, the Wausau-Duluth line will require the approval of the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin and the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board; and
WHEREAS, MEUW independent control and operation of the transmission system is a critical prerequisite to retail competition;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Jefferson strongly endorses the Wausau-Duluth transmission line project;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Jefferson supports the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin conditioning approval of the line on a commitment from the project sponsors that when the line is brought into service, it will be under the control of an independent operator; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be sent to Governor Thompson, area members of the State Legislature, and the three Commissioners of the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin.
City Administrator Schornack gave a brief background on the resolution.
Ald. Tennyson commented that this will be a great benefit to Southwestern Wisconsin.
Ald. Tennyson, seconded by Ald. Wenzel moved to recommend Resolution No. 96. Motion carried on a voice vote.
Adoption of a 15 day refund policy for tax payments made by escrow check
Ald. Beyer introduced Resolution No. 97.
CITY OF JEFFERSON
RESOLUTION NO. 97
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Common Council of the City of Jefferson that the City will issue escrow check refunds for all tax overpayments received by December 31, within 15 business days of the overpayment.
City Clerk/Treasurer Parlow gave a brief explanation of the resolution.
Ald. Coffman, seconded by Ald. Johann moved to recommend Resolution No. 97. Motion carried on a voice vote.
PURCHASE OF A Truck mounted jet/vacuum machine
Ald. Johann introduced Resolution No. 98.
CITY OF JEFFERSON
RESOLUTION NO. 98
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Common Council of the City of Jefferson that the City Administrator is hereby authorized to purchase a truck mounted Jet/Vacuum Machine from Great Lakes Underground Equipment in the amount of $165,450.
Ald. Beyer commented that this truck was the low bid and had all of the options that the Streets and WWTP were looking for.
City Administrator noted that the truck was costing approximately $5,450 more than they anticipated. However, this would not cause a budget deficit.
Ald. Johann, seconded by Ald. Beyer moved to recommend Resolution No. 98. On call of the roll, motion carried unanimously.
PERFORMANCE BOND FOR BOAT DOCK FACILITY
Ald. Oppermann introduced Resolution No. 99.
CITY OF JEFFERSON
RESOLUTION NO. 99
BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Jefferson that the requirement for a performance bond for the construction of the boat dock facility be waived.
Ald. Johann indicated that Finance Committee did not make a recommendation.
City Administrator Schornack indicated that Foeresters were unable to attain a performance bond as the bid had called for. It was staff's and counsel's recommendation that the City use a letter of credit to aid in the completion of the project.
Ald. Coffman was concerned with the City's past experience with letters of credit.
Ald. Johann made a motion to recommend the next bidder for $27,000.
Ald. Wenzel felt that Foeresters' was a good choice and that they would do the job well. He stated that he has used them for his own projects and has been very pleased. He recommended the letter of credit for Foeresters.
Ald. Beyer stated that since the City did not know if the second bidder had done this type of project before, it wouldn't necessarily benefit the City to contract with the second bidder for an additional cost. (Since the same amount of engineering oversight would be needed.)
Ald. Coffman asked if the other bidder was local. City Engineer Ludwig and Park and Recreation Director Keller responded that the bidder was located outside of the City.
After discussion, Ald. Johann withdrew her amendment.
Ald. Oppermann, seconded by Ald. Wenzel moved to recommend Resolution No. 99. Motion carried on a voice vote. Ald. Johann cast a dissenting vote.
Ald. Wagner, seconded by Ald. Stevens moved to adjourn to closed session pursuant to Sections 19.85(1)(c) of the Wisconsin State Statutes related to Employment. Motion carried on a voice vote.
Ald. Wagner, seconded by Ald. Stevens moved to reconvene to open session. The motion carried on a voice vote.
HIRE OF A STREET CREWPERSON
Ald. Wenzel introduced Resolution No. 100.
CITY OF JEFFERSON
RESOLUTION NO. 100
BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Jefferson that the City Administrator is hereby authorized to hire Joe Riedl for the position of Street Crewperson.
Ald. Wenzel noted that this resolution was unanimous at Personnel.
Ald. Wenzel, seconded by Ald. Beyer moved to recommend Resolution No. 100. Motion carried on a voice vote.
REPORTS
CHIEF OF POLICE
Chief Besel reported:
CITY ENGINEER
City Engineer Ludwig reported:
CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney Scheibel reported:
CITY CLERK/TREASURER
City Clerk/Treasurer Parlow reported:
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
City Administrator Schornack reported:
COMMITTEES
Ald. Johann commented that the Senior Committee will be meeting on October 25th at 5:00 p.m. They will be on the WFAW "Morning Magazine" program on October 26th.
Ald. Stevens stated that the Police Department Committee met on October 18th. They discussed the Proposed timetable for the project, with bids to be let in January and February.
Ald. Tennyson, seconded by Ald. Wagner, moved to adjourn the October 19, 1999, meeting of the City of Jefferson Common Council. The motion carried on a voice vote.
These minutes of the October 19, 1999, meeting of the Common Council are uncorrected. Any corrections made thereto will be noted in the proceedings at which time the minutes are approved.